ehowton (
ehowton) wrote2025-12-14 11:56 am
ehowton (
ehowton) wrote2025-12-13 01:52 pm
Entry tags:
Dopamine
Found as a comment on LessWrong:
Dopamine might be what regulates top-down, "will-imposing" action.
Stimulants are great for increasing attention, motivation and mood. However, they also cause downregulation of dopamine receptors, thus potentially causing dependence and the opposite of the benefits when not taking them.
Some lesser-known ways to upregulate the dopaminergic system without (or with less of) this effect:
Aspirin (upregulates TH - dopamine synthesis): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30187283/
Creatine (potentiates dopaminergics somehow): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22674968/
ALCAR (component of Monster drinks - upregulates D1 receptors): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27975173/
Caffeine (upregulates D3, D5 receptors): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4462609/
Sulbutiamine (upregulates D1 receptors): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10996447/ (a vitamin B1 derivative, a similar one (allithiamine) might be created by combining garlic (source of allicin) with conventional thiamine HCl)
vitamin D (increases GDNF, which increases survival of dopaminergic neurons): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29018141/
Thus, an easily available stack for improving attention might be Monster drink + vitamin D + Aspirin (and potentially some shredded garlic with thiamine HCl).
ehowton (
ehowton) wrote2025-12-11 10:17 am
Entry tags:
List of Grievances
I used to pirate music and movies. Oh, I bought and paid for them, but I also pirated them. A jailable offense despite owning it. Well, back before it was "owning a license to watch/listen." Why? Because of deceptive marketing practices which were somehow not illegal (somehow being the dystopian cyberpunk corporatocracy in which we currently reside). What I mean by that (before streaming was a thing) was being forced to purchase shitty movies in a pack with the only movie you wanted to watch but wasn't sold individually. Screenshots of the single explosion in the entire film being plastered on a slow drama because passing it off as an "action" film was seen as more profitable. It was game-changing when iTunes offered single-song purchase so you wouldn't have to purchase the entire album just for one song you wanted. Until they started chipping that away, because of course they did.
Currently I pay for a service which allows me to browse and download royalty-free music. But YouTube still flags it, and the if I can skip the management of such by quickly, effortlessly, and inexpensively creating my own with AI, why wouldn't I?

ehowton (
ehowton) wrote2025-11-24 08:00 pm
Entry tags:
"Relationship"
Today's call revealed she's been trying to write me a letter. One in which she details all her feelings, but she's stopped and started so many times that was the primary reason for this request:
I think you need to come visit. I'm putting it out there because you have been breaking down your feelings for me but also because in person conversations are needed for us to figure out what our "relationship" will look like. I also think we need the space in each other's to figure out some other boundaries.
There was a time I would've killed for that letter.
ehowton (
ehowton) wrote2025-12-08 10:52 am
Insufferable
In the online dating world it is usually more interesting (for me) that a woman reads my profile and initiates contact rather than responds to my first contact. I had one of those recently and her profile said nothing more than, "I'm different than any girl you know." Of course I challenged that. Turns out she's deaf and legally blind. Told her she won that round then engaged her further about her hobbies and interests.
She, "unliked" me.
At least I know it's not my looks keeping me from dating, but unsure what that says about my ability to engage others.











